Forthcoming Books
Macchiarella, Lindsey, Christoph Flamm, Simon Nicholls, Vasilis Kallis, ed. Rethinking Scriabin. Forthcoming from Oxford University Press.
Books In Progress
Toward the Flame: The Life of Aleksandr Skryabin.
Forthcoming Book Chapters
“Scriabin the Wagnerian: Reception and Influence.” In Rethinking Scriabin, edited by Lindsey Macchiarella, Christoph Flamm, Simon Nicholls, Vasilis Kallis. Oxford University Press.
“Stravinsky and the U.S.A.” In Strawinsky-Handbuch, edited by Christoph Flamm. Bärenreiter.
Articles
“Scriabin, Wilhelm Wundt, and Early Experimental Psychology.” Journal of the Scriabin Society of America 17/1 (2025): 48-68.
“Reich and Gursky: Parallel Minimalist and Post-Minimalist Narratives in Music and Photography.” Music in Art 46 (2021): 173-184.
“Modernizing Satie: Performance, History, and Aesthetic Ideology” Keyboard Perspectives 12 (2019-20): 45-60.
“Early French Modernism Across Modalities: Erik Satie and Eugène Atget.” Music in Art 42/2 (2017): 11-30.
Forthcoming Articles
“Bayreuth in Indien: Alexandr Skryabins utopischer Tempel” [Bayreuth in India: Aleksandr Skryabin’s Utopian Temple] Wagnerspectrum (2026)
Reviews
Review of Robert Schumann, Concerto in A Minor for Violoncello and Orchestra, Op. 129. Edited by Kate Bennett Wadsworth (Bärenreiter Urtext, 2024). Nineteenth-Century Music Review (2025): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147940982510058X.
Review of Leonora Duarte: The Complete Works. Sonnambula, Elizabeth Weinfield, Director. Centaur Records CRC 3685. Viola da Gamba Society of America Newsletter 58/1 (Spring, 2021), 26-27.
Review of Pietro Vinci, Sonetti Spirituali, Fourteen Spiritual Sonnets of Vittoria Colonna (score edition and album), by Sarah Mead and Nota Bene. Viola da Gamba Society of America Newsletter 57/3 (2020): 30-31.
Review of Size Matt’reth Not, by Phillip Serna, Dwarf Star Audio. Viola da Gamba Society of America Newsletter 57/4 (2020): 20.
Review of Wildcat Viols: The Magnifick Consort of Four Parts, by Wildcat Viols. Viola da Gamba Society of America Newsletter 57/4 (2020): 22.
Publications Abstracts
“Scriabin, Wilhelm Wundt, and Early Experimental Psychology.” Journal of the Scriabin Society of America 17/1 (2025): 48-68.
Aleksandr Scriabin is well-known for his grandiose his plans to “evolve” humanity though mass exposure to multi-sensory art, ideas he manifested in his light-symphony, Prometheus, and sketched in his incomplete, ritualistic drama, Prefatory Action. Scholarly discourse on Skryabin’s philosophies typically points to the influence of theosophy, usually in reference to memoirs by his early biographers, Sabaneyev and Schloezer. Scriabin’s theories, as outlined in his 1904-06 private journals, however, contain no direct theosophical references. They begin, instead, with a quote from Wilhelm Wundt, the “Father of Experimental Psychology.” While theosophy, philosophy, and evolutionary theory certainly play a role in shaping Scriabin’s worldview and goals, this paper argues that the budding field of experimental psychology was most influential of all. Wundt’s quote sets the tone and topic for Scriabin’s subsequent “self-observations.” His explicit goal in the journals was to observe his own mind – his thoughts, feelings, sensations – and to draw conclusions about the nature of consciousness and his experience of reality. Scriabin’s fascination with the field of psychology takes on new meaning when situated in the context of its disruptive emergence in the mid-19th century, and its complex relationship to the field of philosophy at the turn of the 20th. A comparative analysis between Scriabin and Wundt’s writings illuminates an intricate web of influence, and demonstrates the extent to which Scriabin departed from, and elaborated upon Wundt’s ideas in the development of his own theories on consciousness and multi-modal productions.
“Scriabin the Wagnerian: Reception and Influence.” In Rethinking Scriabin. Forthcoming from Oxford University Press, 2025.
Though today Scriabin is usually considered a music-historical outlier, he was once an integral part of modern classical musical culture, emblematic of changing trends in art, a central figure of public debate. Boris de Schloezer claimed in his biography of the composer that Scriabin was musically autonomous. On the contrary, during his lifetime Scriabin was associated in public discourse. This paper examines music-historical narratives of Scriabin in the early 20th century, placing him at the center of discussions of music and nationalism, philosophy, style, tradition, and the birth of modernism. He was widely known as an orchestral composer in the progressive school, following in Wagner’s footsteps, an association Scriabin intentionally fostered and eventually strove to overcome. Scriabin initially encouraged the Wagner comparison at the beginning of his career, drawing heavily on both the composer’s style and theories as he developed his own.
“Reich and Gursky: Parallel Minimalist and Post-Minimalist Narratives in Music and Photography.” Music in Art 46 (2021): 173-184.
Both Reich and Gursky have traced parallel aesthetic paths in their respective fields of music and photography, from the inherited conventions of their predecessors at the origins of minimalism, to their mature style in the post-minimalist aesthetic. Early minimalist musical works, such as LaMonte Young’s Composition 1960 #7 (see fig. 1), or the Trio for Strings, scrutinize miniscule amounts of sonic material for prolonged stretches of time, magnifying an otherwise banal sound-world and re-framing it as an immersive, artistic experience. Similarly, Bernd and Hilla Becher’s school of photographic objectivity glorified the systematic experience by serializing overlooked images; through repetition, they sought to create a visual typology of a concept, an ur-bilder. Reich and Gursky eventually abandoned the impersonal procedures of these predecessors in favor of approaches that incorporated the mechanical procedures of the first minimalists to enhance the drama of their own works, which are strikingly similar, though from radically different mediums. Both artists use a more subjective, intuitive, and aesthetically-oriented style that incorporates process as a means to an end, rather than an end in itself. Reich’s early aesthetic, spelled out in his manifesto, “Music as Gradual Process,” was exemplified in his phase pieces, such as Come Out. His starting point is comparable to the Bechers’ Anonymous Sculpture (1970) (see fig. 2), for example, which surveys common forms in the Industrial landscape using a serial format. Gursky, a student of the Bechers, began with the same techniques as his teachers, as seen in his early serial works. Reich’s Music for 18 Musicians breaks from the strict automation and emotional detachment of early minimalism, but incorporates a variety of techniques derived from those procedures, such as insistent repetition, additive rhythm, transposition, and quasi-functional harmony, for dramatic effect. Gursky’s recognizable, mature style, features enormous, hyper-detailed, digitally manipulated photos (see fig. 3). These photographs on the subject of globalization and architecture, are indebted to the mechanical repetition and minimalistic aesthetic of his predecessors, but similarly embrace the subjectivity and chaos of commercial culture at the microscopic level, featuring a characteristic tension between the macro and micro.
“Modernizing Satie: Performance, History, and Aesthetic Ideology” Keyboard Perspectives (2019): 45-60.
Abstract: Influenced by John Cage and popular aesthetics of “atmospheric” music, a growing contingent of pianists and critics since the 1990s have crafted an “authentic” performance practice of Satie’s piano works, characterized by slow tempi, liberal pedal, and avoidance of expressive gestures. Though this interpretation is seemingly corroborated by Satie’s idea of Furniture Music and “Vexations,” these were isolated experiments that are now projected onto Satie’s entire oeuvre. An examination of early recordings by Poulenc demonstrate that before Satie became popularly associated with John Cage, works from his earlier and later periods were played with a variety of Romantic expressive gestures.
“Early French Modernism Across Modalities: Erik Satie and Eugène Atget.” Music in Art 42/2 (2017): 11-30.
Abstract: Major cultural movements are not limited to a single medium of art and cross-medium comparisons bring changing aesthetics into sharper focus. While modernism is often examined from an interdisciplinary point of view, music and photography have yet to be considered together. Composer Erik Satie and photographer Eugène Atget were contemporary progenitors of French Modernism in their relative fields and were highly influential on younger generations. Though they worked in starkly contrasting mediums, their works show surprisingly similar features, such as the resolute and mocking rejection of Romanticism and a preference for functional, documentary, and spatially oriented art. Their structural juxtapositions and subtle exaggeration would later be heralded as the seeds of surrealism. Most distinctive, perhaps, is their avoidance of narrative and creation of a non-teleological sense of time. This study puts both Satie and Atget in an exceptional context, demonstrating the intrinsic interconnectedness of French Modernist aesthetics.
Dissertation
“Skryabin’s Prefatory Action: Libretto, Sketches, and Divine Unity” (2016)
Abstract: Prefatory Action is an unfinished work existing partially in the realm of hypothetical hearsay, and partially in the drafts of the libretto and musical sketches found after Skryabin’s death. Nearly all of the literature on this piece is cursory, or focuses only on summarizing and reiterating information from his early biographers. This dissertation undertakes an in-depth study of the libretto and sketches, presenting new research on primary sources, and positing interpretations of the work in the context of Skryabin’s theories.
The composer’s philosophies, as described in his private journals, are the product of the diligent study and fusion of studies from contemporary psychology, nineteenth-century philosophy, and Theosophy. Skryabin constructed both an ontology of the nature of consciousness and reality, and proposed strategies for transcending the limited mode of human experience through spiritual and mental unification. Prefatory Action would be both a representation of this unification, and an artistic event that would help educate the human race in order to fully realize it in the future. The Prefatory Action libretto outlines Skryabin’s version of the history of humanity – a cycle of unified, and differentiated consciousnesses – and represents the near future, in which humanity embraces death and abandons corporeal form to mingle their consciousnesses. Contrary to the typical characterization of Skryabin’s ideas, especially those concerning Prefatory Action, as wildly insane, they are actually organized into a fairly consistent and logical system, and they are deeply connected to contemporary occult culture, which would have found many sympathizers in the early twentieth century. The Prefatory Action libretto demonstrates many of the characteristics of modernism, including an emphasis on progress and the future, and the aesthetics of early twentieth-century symbolism and ritualism.
The musical sketches for Prefatory Action contain no obvious connections to the libretto, but they reveal the style of the music intended for the work. Skryabin’s strategies for atonal composition included deriving octatonic and acoustic collections by stacking intervallic patterns, and outlining and progressively developing very brief fragments of music. Small fragments of some of his late, published works appear in the Prefatory Action sketches, helping to flesh out our understanding of both the Prefatory Action style and the compositional process for Skryabin’s late pieces.